Thank you for Subscribing to Agri Business Review Weekly Brief
A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives, a curated forum for agribusiness leaders across the agricultural value chain, nominated by our subscribers and vetted by the Agri Business Review Editorial Board.



When a Technical Change Reaches the Customer
Prior to getting engaged with our company’s move towards colors from natural sources, my primary view of color was related to marketing aspects. I knew about its importance in the area of visual impact, product differentiation, perceptions, and ultimately the final consumer’s experience. Working along with our R&D and FSQA departments, I gained a better appreciation of the level of work that is involved in something that looks simple at first sight.
My most important lesson was not about formulation. It was about leadership, professional boundaries, and collaboration. Marketing has an essential role during a technical transition, but that role is not to replace the expertise of R&D or FSQA. Our responsibility is to listen carefully, understand the approved information, and translate it into clear, useful communication for customers and commercial teams.
Respecting the Authority Behind the Information
The technical teams are responsible for formulation evaluations, product performance, quality requirements, and technical accuracy. Marketing must respect that ownership and avoid making interpretations, promises, or assertions without guidance from the appropriate subject-matter experts.
Responsible communication starts with clear ownership. R&D and FSQA provide technical and quality expertise. Marketing brings market understanding, message discipline, and communication consistency. Sales and Customer Service bring direct customer insight and understand how the message will be received in the field. Operations helps ensure that what is communicated aligns with what can be executed. When each function contributes from its area of expertise, the final message becomes stronger, more accurate, and more credible.
The visit to the R&D lab reinforced this perspective. Seeing the work behind the process firsthand expanded my understanding of the complexity involved and reminded me that strong leadership requires humility, curiosity, and respect for the people closest to the technical details.
Marketing as a Cross-Functional Bridge
In the business-to-business manufacturing sector, it is rare that a client makes an assessment based on a single point of view. The company’s purchasing, quality assurance, regulatory, research and development, production, and operations departments will have different requirements for information. Marketing must be aware of these groups without altering the technical message.
Marketing must respect that ownership and avoid making interpretations, promises, or assertions without guidance from the appropriate subject-matter experts.
The goal is not to oversimplify information to the point that critical details are lost. The goal is to make approved information accessible, consistent, and useful for the people who need to act on it. In this transition, Marketing helped coordinate customer notifications, digital updates, sales materials, internal talking points, and other customer-facing communication. Each message needed to be aligned with the appropriate departments before distribution, so customers received information that was both understandable and accurate.
Consistency Builds Confidence
Change to a technical process can be a cause for uncertainty, particularly if it might impact how a product looks, how it is described, or how the customer performs their own processes. Even if all the answers are not at hand right away, companies can communicate responsibly by outlining the knowns, stating the unknowns, and reporting back on what has been reviewed and agreed upon.
It is important that customers receive consistent information no matter if they are talking to Marketing, Sales, Customer Service, Quality Control, or Operations. Having the same source of information ensures consistency and avoids conflicting explanations. Consistency does not mean parroting the same information without tailoring it to the listener.
Communication Begins with Listening
The one biggest threat involved in the process of changing something technically is the speed of communication. Marketing teams always have to be prompt, yet accuracy cannot suffer for it.
I have discovered that communication must start with listening, first and foremost, to those people who know everything about the product and then to the clients who will need some preparation for the change. This implies that communication demands patience, humbleness, and readiness to revise the message, if any new information is acquired. Marketing must understand what information it needs to withhold. Being unable to answer something does not make Marketing weak.
Leadership Through Alignment
The leadership lesson I would pass on to other marketing professionals is simple: collaboration should come before communication. Involve technical and quality teams early. Define clear ownership and approval processes. Establish one credible source of information. Prepare customer-facing teams before public announcements are made. Most importantly, protect the accuracy of the message, even when there is pressure to move quickly.
Marketing adds value to technical change by connecting expertise with understanding. We do not have to become the technical experts ourselves, but we do have to recognize the experts, ask the right questions, align the organization around approved information, and communicate to customers with clarity, credibility, and purpose. That is where leadership, collaboration, and communication come together.